• Support Us
  • Tales from the Meeting
facebook
rss
twitter
youtube
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • District Sites
  • Categories
    • Advocacy
    • Data and Accountability Center
    • Family-School Partnerships
    • Funding and Finance
    • School Policy and Procedure
    • Special Education
    • Standards
  • Glossary
  • Special Reports
    • Alabama Accountability Act (AAA)
    • Bullying Forum Resources
    • The Hidden Cost of Public Education
    • Student Harassment Prevention Act
    • Transparency Projects – 2010 and 2009
    • Reports and Stuff
  • About
    • About Us
    • Business Documents
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fundraising Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Our Supporters
  • 2016 Legislative Session
    • 2015 Legislative Summary
    • 2014 Legislative Summary
    • 2013 Legislative Summary
    • 2012 Legislative Summary
    • 2011 Legislative Summary
  • Support Us
Latest News
Goodbye. But only for a moment
Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved
Enrollment Opens for Alabama’s Non-Traditional High School Diploma
Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law
State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten
What the Annual Alabama “School Incident Report” Shows
Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready
Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?
More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School – Look Up Your School
How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

Stop Buying the Lie That Children in Poverty Can’t Learn at High Levels

Posted On Apr 09 2013
By : Trisha Powell Crain
Comment: 0
Tag: 2013 Alabama Legislative Session, Alabama Accountability Act, nclb, poverty, school choice, Teachers, Torchbearer Schools

The title pretty much sums it up.  But if you need some proof that children in poverty can learn at high levels, read on.

The common belief is that children who live in poverty are unable to learn and perform as well on standardized tests as children in families not in poverty.  It’s kind of like the conspiracy theories that folks just won’t stop believing in.  Even locally, we perpetuate the stereotype that children in poverty just simply are unable to learn at high levels.

But it is just not true.  It is a lie that continues to be perpetrated by those who want to make excuses for why children in Alabama, children in poverty, are not learning at high levels.  You will learn of many examples of schools right here in Alabama that are filled with children in poverty and yet are very high-performing, even out-performing some of the schools filled with traditionally high-performing students.

Case in point:  Hudson K-8 in Birmingham City Schools compared to Brookwood Forest Elementary in Mountain Brook schools.  Here is a chart looking at what percent of children in poverty in Hudson K-8 compared to children not in poverty in Brookwood Forest scored at Level IV (the equivalent of “proficient” on the National Assessment of Educational Progress) on the Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) in Math.

Let’s look at Reading scores: Mobile County Schools’ Council Elementary’s students in poverty compared to the same Mountain Brook school.

The Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama (PARCA), in a presentation to the League of Women Voters of Greater Birmingham in February, shared this chart of all schools’ gains in percentage of students performing at Level IV in Grade 3 Reading over a five-year period correlated with the percentage of students in poverty.  

At the near-100% poverty level, there is a 109-percentage point spread in the gains these schools have made.  Which means some schools are making great gains with the same population of students….poor students….while other schools are losing ground.  What’s up with that?  Why the difference?  Why are some schools more successful than others with the same level of poverty?  Why the wide range?  Doesn’t it make you question whether it’s the students’ abilities that are really the variable?

If students’ abilities are the variable, then I guess there are just dumber kids in those schools that are in the lower range of improvement.  I mean, it must be, right?  Maybe just certain parts of the state have dumber kids.

I hope that statement infuriated you as much as it infuriated me to type it.  Of course that’s not true.  All children can learn at high levels.  Say it with me:  all children can learn at high levels.

Demographics do not determine destiny.   Repeat: Demographics do not determine destiny.  We must stop making excuses for schools that are filled with students in poverty.  Here’s a presentation from The Education Trust, a national organization that advocates for children in poverty.  Start around slide 72 for a look at schools that are high-performing, high-poverty schools.  These schools are getting it done.  Their students are learning at high levels.  EdTrust even highlights George Hall Elementary in Mobile County Schools as an example of a school that is dispelling the myth that students in poverty cannot achieve at high levels.

And now, for the bestest examples we have here in Alabama.  You see, there is this fabulous group of schools known as Torchbearer Schools here in Alabama. The Torchbearer Schools have been recognized each year since 2004.  The students, teachers, principals, and members of the community in these schools have proven year after year that all students can learn at high levels.  All students.  All of them.  Regardless of poverty status, race, ethnicity.

There’s no denying that it’s hard work.  But no one ever said that teaching would be easy, did they?  Isn’t that why it requires some type of college degree and certification and training?  Did anyone say that learning would be easy?  If learning is easy, shouldn’t it be harder?  Aren’t we here to challenge our children to reach their potential?

Back in 2005, I read a study called “Inside the Black Box of High-Performing, High-Poverty Schools”.  This study looked at eight schools in Kentucky that continually performed at high levels to see what characteristics they shared in common. The idea was to document these characteristics so that they could be replicated.  In 2004, the ALSDE took a look at Alabama’s then-13 Torchbearers to determine what they may have in common.

“The most striking similarity found at all of the schools was their complete commitment to the educational process and the well-being of their children.” 

From the 2004-2005 Torchbearer Schools booklet:

“Now is an appropriate time to point out that all 13 principals of the Torchbearer Schools used the term ‘family’ or ‘extended family’ at some point when discussing their schools. In fact,at Huxford Elementary School, the principal told every class and every teacher how deeply she cared for them. Such a sense of community and shared responsibility was palpable in all Torchbearer Schools, and the benefits of such an attitude were evident wherever one looked.”

From the same publication, here are the “processes” the Torchbearers seemed to share:

  1. Autonomy – Principals of Torchbearer Schools enjoy a degree of autonomy that allows them to address student achievement issues specific to their school. Couple that autonomy with shared leadership, a process used extensively in Torchbearer Schools, and the result is schools in which student achievement decisions are highly influenced by the adults with the most knowledge of the challenges present…the teachers.
  2. Goals – The goals in Torchbearer Schools are both tangible and measurable. The goals of Torchbearer Schools are objective and specifically measurable because they are used to appraise the schools’ progress.
  3. Faculty – If one thing sets the Torchbearer Schools apart from other schools, it is the strength and commitment of their faculties. Such a statement is not meant to shed a less than favorable light on other faculties, but simply to point out the difference that an energetic and committed faculty can make in the lives of children. Every Torchbearer principal praised his/her school’s faculty and staff. Each emphasized that the success of the school was directly attributable to the personnel within it. Each also emphasized that his/her faculties were filled with leaders who saw ALL students as THEIR students and who sought to work with other teachers to benefit everyone. Such individuals truly take ownership in the educational process.
  4. Leadership – The faculties of the Torchbearer Schools are all examples of excellence. The same can be said for the leaders of the schools. Though the Torchbearer principals are extremely effective, each accomplishes tasks in his/her own unique way.
  5. Assessment and Achievement – all Torchbearer Schools rely heavily on assessment to determine student achievement and to drive student instruction. What differentiates the Torchbearer Schools from many others is the amount of time they spend analyzing their assessment data and the extent to which they discuss that data with their students.
  6. Culture and Climate – The culture of the Torchbearer Schools revolves around children, and it is evident wherever one goes.
I encourage you to look at both “Inside the Black Box” and the Torchbearer Schools booklet.  Striking similarities. Seems like somebody would be working this into a model somewhere, doesn’t it?

The Torchbearer As a Model for Replication

Last year, when charter schools were on the legislative menu, State Board President Pro Tem Ella Bell continually asked why we couldn’t just implement the “Torchbearer Model” and forget about charter schools.  Mrs. Bell’s district had been redrawn, and she was introduced to nationally-renowned George Hall Elementary and other Torchbearers in her new district.  “Don’t tell me it can’t be done, because I have seen it with my own eyes,” Mrs. Bell stated at a board work session. The “it” she was referring to was successful educational outcomes for children in poverty.  Throughout the 2012 legislative session, Mrs. Bell kept asking for the Torchbearer Model to be utilized.  While all stated that there was no “Torchbearer Model” to implement, I couldn’t help but question whether no model really exists.

We have the model.  We have been writing about it since 2004.  And many of the findings about Torchbearer Schools have no doubt been woven into strategic plans across the state.  No doubt much lip service has been paid to trying to do what the Torchbearers have DONE.

What is different about the Torchbearers, then?  Do they have more money?  No.  More community support?  Not usually.  More support from their business community?  Not necessarily.

They just work hard and truly care about the outcomes for the children they educate.  The adults in the school buy in to the student’s success and feel responsible for that success.  And no, I’m not saying that those schools who perform poorly are necessarily filled with adults who don’t care.  But I am poking them to ask them to care more.

If one of the “failing” schools is in your community, there is work to be done.  Work that can only be initiated by those who are willing to actually do the work.

The folks in Montgomery…in the legislature and at the ALSDE and other government agencies…can only do so much for our children.  They make laws and rules and have attempted to provide a framework within which success can be had.  And yet, through all of the rules and framework that exists, “failing” schools still exist.

The Torchbearers have proven that it really doesn’t matter if you’re rich or poor, Black or White, tall or short, from single- or dual-parent homes….children can learn at high levels if the right methods are employed and if the adults in the school truly invest themselves in the success of the children within their walls.

We know what it takes.  Let’s create that Torchbearer Model that Mrs. Bell talked about.

Share this

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
About the Author
    Previous Story

    Let’s Look Closer at the Education Trust Fund Budget….

    Next Story

    When School Districts Don’t Share Information They’re Required to Share with Us

    Related Posts

    0

    Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law

    Posted On Oct 02 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready

    Posted On Sep 14 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    3

    The Numbers Are In: SGOs Are Paying More than the State to Educate Students

    Posted On Aug 02 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    Court Documents Reveal Turmoil within Hoover’s Trace Crossings Elementary Is Nothing New

    Posted On Jun 05 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain

    Alabama School Connection Tweets

    Tweets by @ALSchoolConnect

    School Tweets – direct from Twitter

    Tweets from https://twitter.com/ALSchoolConnect/lists/al-k-12-twitter
    Creative Commons License
    This work by Alabama School Connection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Terms of Use
    Privacy Policy

    Past Editions of K-12 Must-Read News

    August 29 to September 25, 2016
    July 25 to August 28, 2016
    June 24 to July 24, 2016
    May 23 to June 23, 2016
    May 2 to May 22, 2016
    April 18 to May 1, 2016
    March 16 to April 17, 2016
    February 23 to March 15, 2016
    February 1 to February 22, 2016
    January 11 to January 31, 2016
    December 21, 2015, thru January 10, 2016
    November 30 thru December 20
    November 11 thru November 30
    October 21 thru November 10
    October 6 thru October 20
    September 14 thru October 5
    August 24 thru September 13
    August 3 thru August 23
    July 16 thru August 2
    June 18 thru July 13
    May 19 thru June 17, 2015
    May 18, 2015
    April 27, 2015
    March 30, 2015
    March 11, 2015
    February 2, 2015
    January 5, 2015
    December 16, 2014

    All past editions available on Storify at https://storify.com/ALSchoolConnect

    This website is intended for informational purposes only. The ASC is a nonprofit news organization and exists only to keep the public informed of issues as they relate to the K-12 education system in Alabama. In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately at the e-mail link below. The ASC does not maintain offices nor a working telephone number dedicated for the organization. Links are provided as a courtesy, not as an endorsement.
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.