• Support Us
  • Tales from the Meeting
facebook
rss
twitter
youtube
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • District Sites
  • Categories
    • Advocacy
    • Data and Accountability Center
    • Family-School Partnerships
    • Funding and Finance
    • School Policy and Procedure
    • Special Education
    • Standards
  • Glossary
  • Special Reports
    • Alabama Accountability Act (AAA)
    • Bullying Forum Resources
    • The Hidden Cost of Public Education
    • Student Harassment Prevention Act
    • Transparency Projects – 2010 and 2009
    • Reports and Stuff
  • About
    • About Us
    • Business Documents
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fundraising Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Our Supporters
  • 2016 Legislative Session
    • 2015 Legislative Summary
    • 2014 Legislative Summary
    • 2013 Legislative Summary
    • 2012 Legislative Summary
    • 2011 Legislative Summary
  • Support Us
Latest News
Goodbye. But only for a moment
Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved
Enrollment Opens for Alabama’s Non-Traditional High School Diploma
Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law
State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten
What the Annual Alabama “School Incident Report” Shows
Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready
Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?
More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School – Look Up Your School
How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

The “Failing” Schools List – What Does It Really Show Us?

Posted On Jun 21 2013
By : Trisha Powell Crain
Comments: 4
Tag: Accountability, Alabama Accountability Act, ARMT, Family engagement, NAEP, PARCA, school choice

PicNow that we know which schools have met the definition of “failing” according to the Alabama Accountability Act (AAA), it’s time to examine it more closely: what is the test that is used, which schools ended up on The List and do they actually belong there?

Al.com took a look at the demographics of the student population in the schools on The List, including a look at race and what percentage of the children live in poverty (as indicated by the numbers of students receiving a free or reduced lunch). Folks still tend to blame student poverty (as opposed to any school-based characteristic) for poor standardized test scores, even with proof supplied by schools here in Alabama that are filled with students in poverty who are succeeding at high levels. Far be it from me to burst their bubble.

Here’s an interactive map to click on to see where schools on The List are.

You can be morally outraged that The List exists if you choose, but the fact is that its creation was required by law. And if you think for one moment that The List names all of the schools who are under-performing, I have some swamp land in Nebraska for sale.

So what does The List really show us?

The Test That Decided The List

The “Level 3 and 4″ column on The List refers to the combined/”all students” scoring at Level III or IV of the Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT), the standardized, Alabama-created test used to measure what students have learned in our schools.  The ARMT was criticized by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) as basically not being tough enough, likening Alabama’s “proficient” (Level 3) on the ARMT with the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) “basic” level. NAEP tests are only given at the 4th and 8th grade levels. See the table below, taken from page 23 of this document

ARMT v NAEP Alabama

So in 2005, when Alabama claimed to have 83% of 4th-grade children “proficient” in state reading standards, only 22% of those students would have been considered “proficient” at the national level of reading standards. I explain this just to make sure we all understand what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about the ARMT. The state standardized test.  It’s not really a high bar as tests go.

Here is the Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama’s (PARCA) comparison of the ARMT’s levels with the NAEP’s levels of proficiency.

PARCA NAEP v ARMT

Just look at the sliding scale to get an idea of the comparison. The results shown in the graph are statewide for 2011. If you haven’t already, you MUST take a look at PARCA’s test score comparisons for Alabama’s school systems. PARCA looks at the percentage of students scoring at Level IV only, which gives a much better indication, in my opinion, of the competitiveness of students on a national level. If we used PARCA’s parameters, The List might look differently.

The Scores that Decided The List

Look not only at the names on The List, but also at the actual numerical scores. And remember that this is an “all students” score, as opposed to being broken down by demographic group or poverty status or some other “subgroup” that the ALSDE uses to identify populations that are struggling within schools.

I have added a column to the 72-school list provided by the ALSDE (without the schools serving “special populations”) to show their progress or lack thereof in the past six years. The List is ordered by progress made over the past six years, with those making the most numerical progress listed first. Cells indicated in green show progress of 10 or more percentage points, yellow cells indicate 1 to 10 percentage points of progress, and red cells indicated zero or negative progress.  Fifty-five of these schools have shown some improvement in the past six years. Seventeen have not.

AAA 72 school list Reordered

Click here if you wish to download this list rather than squint at the screen.

Look at the percentages of students scoring at Level 3 or 4, which Alabama deems proficient, but the NAEP deems basic. Look at only the 2012 results to see where they are now. Take a moment to ponder what it means for a school to have barely half of its students score at Level 3 on the ARMT, the state test. And remember that these are just the schools that landed in the bottom 6% for three out of the last six years and this is a combined score of all students at the school.

Just Because Your School Isn’t on The List Doesn’t Mean All Is Well

Just because your school isn’t on The List doesn’t mean that all is well. I know of many schools who have shown no improvement in test scores, even dropped drastically over the past 6 years, who didn’t show up on The List simply because they didn’t fall in the bottom 6% as defined by the AAA.

There are many schools that should be considered “under-performing”, especially when you break down the test scores by subgroup, including by race, students in special education, English-language learners, and children in poverty.

Again, please take a look at PARCA’s test score data to learn how students in your schools are performing. Some school systems are reluctant to use PARCA’s data because it doesn’t show their students’ success in the same light as the lower-standard ARMT does. Contact PARCA if you wish to host a meeting in your school community to allow them to share their results. Contact me if you’d like some help getting that meeting put together.

Is The List Going to Make Much of a Difference for Children in Schools on The List?

The short answer: probably not. Article after article is being written to show how too few children in the schools on The List have too few real choices to attend schools that aren’t on The List: no other schools to transfer to in their own school system, no access to nor money for tuition for private schools. Not to mention there is SO little time for families to make these decisions.

So What Does The List Show Us?

The List was created to meet the requirements under the AAA. Plain and simple. It is up to each of us in our local school communities to understand what The List really shows us, and more importantly, what it doesn’t.

Perhaps the bigger question is what is the Alabama Accountability Act for, and will the AAA actually have the impact the authors intended.

As always, let’s discuss here or on the facebook page.

Share this

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
About the Author
    Previous Story

    Alabama’s High School Graduation Rates 2011-2012

    Next Story

    AYP As We Know It Is Over – Alabama’s Waiver Part 1

    Related Posts

    0

    Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law

    Posted On Oct 02 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready

    Posted On Sep 14 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

    Posted On Aug 24 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    3

    The Numbers Are In: SGOs Are Paying More than the State to Educate Students

    Posted On Aug 02 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain

    Alabama School Connection Tweets

    Tweets by @ALSchoolConnect

    School Tweets – direct from Twitter

    Tweets from https://twitter.com/ALSchoolConnect/lists/al-k-12-twitter
    Creative Commons License
    This work by Alabama School Connection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Terms of Use
    Privacy Policy

    Past Editions of K-12 Must-Read News

    August 29 to September 25, 2016
    July 25 to August 28, 2016
    June 24 to July 24, 2016
    May 23 to June 23, 2016
    May 2 to May 22, 2016
    April 18 to May 1, 2016
    March 16 to April 17, 2016
    February 23 to March 15, 2016
    February 1 to February 22, 2016
    January 11 to January 31, 2016
    December 21, 2015, thru January 10, 2016
    November 30 thru December 20
    November 11 thru November 30
    October 21 thru November 10
    October 6 thru October 20
    September 14 thru October 5
    August 24 thru September 13
    August 3 thru August 23
    July 16 thru August 2
    June 18 thru July 13
    May 19 thru June 17, 2015
    May 18, 2015
    April 27, 2015
    March 30, 2015
    March 11, 2015
    February 2, 2015
    January 5, 2015
    December 16, 2014

    All past editions available on Storify at https://storify.com/ALSchoolConnect

    This website is intended for informational purposes only. The ASC is a nonprofit news organization and exists only to keep the public informed of issues as they relate to the K-12 education system in Alabama. In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately at the e-mail link below. The ASC does not maintain offices nor a working telephone number dedicated for the organization. Links are provided as a courtesy, not as an endorsement.
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.