• Support Us
  • Tales from the Meeting
facebook
rss
twitter
youtube
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • District Sites
  • Categories
    • Advocacy
    • Data and Accountability Center
    • Family-School Partnerships
    • Funding and Finance
    • School Policy and Procedure
    • Special Education
    • Standards
  • Glossary
  • Special Reports
    • Alabama Accountability Act (AAA)
    • Bullying Forum Resources
    • The Hidden Cost of Public Education
    • Student Harassment Prevention Act
    • Transparency Projects – 2010 and 2009
    • Reports and Stuff
  • About
    • About Us
    • Business Documents
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fundraising Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Our Supporters
  • 2016 Legislative Session
    • 2015 Legislative Summary
    • 2014 Legislative Summary
    • 2013 Legislative Summary
    • 2012 Legislative Summary
    • 2011 Legislative Summary
  • Support Us
Latest News
Goodbye. But only for a moment
Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved
Enrollment Opens for Alabama’s Non-Traditional High School Diploma
Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law
State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten
What the Annual Alabama “School Incident Report” Shows
Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready
Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?
More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School – Look Up Your School
How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

AYP As We Know It Is Over – Alabama’s Waiver Part 1

Posted On Jun 24 2013
By : Trisha Powell Crain
Comment: 0
Tag: Accountability, ayp, esea flexibility, ESEA waiver, School Grading System

No More AYP[Click here to view as a printable PDF] This is Part 1 of a three-part series. Part 2 is here. Part 3 is here (added links 3/9/14).

The ALSDE announced on Friday that the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) has granted its ESEA Flexibility Waiver Request (the “waiver”). This waiver is big news for Alabama, the 38th state to receive a waiver. It means that State Superintendent Dr. Tommy Bice’s Plan 2020 is moving full steam ahead.

States have been given the opportunity to seek waivers from the accountability provisions under No Child Left Behind—which we fondly refer to as Adequate Yearly Progress, or AYP—in exchange for making new promises and regulations for schools to follow to improve student achievement.

States seeking waivers have to adhere to three principles: (1) College- and Career-Ready expectations for all students, (2) State-developed differentiated recognition, accountability, and support, and (3) Supporting effective instruction and leadership. This post will focus on Principle 2, related to accountability changes in the waiver.

For Your Review

While more detail has been added since the original waiver request submission in September 2012, the nuts and bolts of it remain the same. As such, here are four posts you can review for background:

  • If Not AYP to Measure Progress, Then What?? Alabama’s ESEA Waiver Request – this is a good primer to understand what the waiver was about

  • Alabama’s ESEA Flexibility Waiver Request Released for Public Comment – The ALSDE’s link to the original document is no longer valid, but it can be found here.
  • Different Performance Expectations for Different Children? Say What?– Again, links have changed. Here’s the original “Attachment 27” referred to in the post.
  • Race-Based Performance Targets – It’s Happening Here in Alabama, Too – this was written in response to an NBC Nightly News segment questioning whether race-based performance targets were reasonable

So Much Is Changing for Accountability

Revamping AYP was no easy task. In exchange for AYP, the ALSDE had to determine how else student achievement can be measured and schools and districts can be held accountable. That’s where Plan 2020 came in: it provided the vision to create what is hoped to be a meaningful method to hold schools and districts accountable for student achievement.

There are so many changes included in this waiver, that it’s going to require more than one post to bring all of them to you. The waiver itself went from 75 to 110 pages and from 27 to 36 Attachments, apparently after a couple of visits from the USDOE.

This post will cover these five areas of the waiver, all associated with accountability (principle 2):

  1. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) – the benchmarks used to determine achievement levels
  2. Graduation Rates
  3. Change in the minimum number of students (“n-size”) needed for a group’s achievement to matter
  4. Local Annual Report Cards
  5. Overall promise of improved accountability

The waiver has four other new areas related to accountability to understand, including:

  • the School/District Performance Index,
  • how achievement gaps are calculated,
  • what the plans are for Reward Schools, Priority Schools, Priority Districts, and Focus Schools
  • the school grading system

Those four areas will be covered in two subsequent posts. If you just can’t wait, feel free to comb through the waiver for yourself.

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

The first thing that jumped out at me in reviewing the approved waiver was the way the Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) have been revised.  AMOs are the percentage of students expected to score at Level 3 or 4 on the Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) in any given year.

“AMOs will increase in annual equal increments toward a goal of reducing by half the percentage of students in the ‘all students’ group and in each ESEA subgroup that is not proficient within six years,” according to the waiver.

The revised AMOs are broken down by grade, subject and subgroup, whereas the original submission from last September was only broken down by subject and subgroup.

Here’s what the original AMOs from September 2012 looked like.

While it was disturbing to learn that AMOs now vary by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic, disability, and English-language learner status, what was most disturbing was the exceedingly low AMOs originally set for children with disabilities and those learning the English language, 15% and 16%, respectfully.

Fortunately, the USDOE must have had concerns as well, and thus the AMOs were revised upward.  The lowest AMOs now are around 42% (for 8th grade reading) for children with disabilities and English language learners expected for this year’s testing, rising to 68% by 2018.

NOTE: Realize that what that means is that less than half of children with disabilities and English-language learners are currently expected to score a Level 3 or 4 on the ARMT, and that only two-thirds will be expected to do so by 2018. [Really struggling with this one.]

AMOs will be re-established in the fall of 2013 for the high school span of grades due to the use of the End-of-Course (EOC) tests for Algebra I and English 10. Apparently that is now the bar: how many students can pass Algebra I and English 10. [Struggling with this one, too.]

The AMOs for Grades 3 through 8 will be re-established by the fall of 2014, after the ACT Aspire tests are given in the spring of 2014.  You may recall that Alabama is the first state to adopt the ACT Aspire series to test student achievement. [I’m going for the antacids here in a moment.]

AMOs will be calculated for each school and district as well as for the whole state. No indication as to when those school- and district-specific AMOs will be released.

Graduation Rates Have Been Revised, Too 

The original graduation rates were very low for students with disabilities and English-language learners, and they, too, have been revised upward in the final approved request.  Graduation rates “will increase in annual equal increments toward a goal of reducing by half the percentage of students in the ‘all students’ group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years.”

Here are the graduation rates submitted last September. Here are the approved graduation rates.

The Good News about When Students Actually Matter

Under the old AYP system, there had to be at least 40 students in a group in order for their annual achievement to matter enough to report, and thus for schools to be held accountable for their progress or lack thereof. For students with disabilities, this led to very few schools being held accountable in any way under the old AYP method for their achievement, as many schools did not have 40 or more students in special education. For example, even at the school district level, only 26 of Alabama’s 132 school systems had more than 40 students in special education and thus were held accountable for those students’ achievement in 2011.

Under the new accountability system, that minimum number of students has been lowered from 40 to 20. But before you get too excited, know that the way that the achievement gap is calculated is going to confound this somewhat. The gap calculation is for the next post.

Local Annual Reports Cards Are Back

Happily, after years of no local report cards, the waiver request states that LEAs (that’s Local Education Agencies, or school districts) “will report annually….on their local report cards, for the ‘all students’ group and for each subgroup: information on student achievement at each proficiency level; data comparing actual achievement levels to the State’s annual measurable objectives; the percentage of students not tested; performance on the other academic indicator for elementary and middle schools; and graduation rates for high schools.”

That’s really good news. Cause right now, this is what you get. All accountability data is combined at the state level, and you have to hunt and peck through the “accountability reporting system”, two years at a time, one grade level and subject at a time, and make your own notes in order to get an understanding of where your local school district is in terms of student achievement.

The bad news is that these report cards won’t be available until the fall/winter of 2015/2016. So I guess we have two more years of not having a clue.

The report card that will be produced will most likely be based on the  A-F method prescribed by the law passed in 2012. What remains to be answered is why the grading system won’t be utilized until 2016, as the law clearly intended the grading system to be ready for the 2013-2014 year.

Overall Improvement in Accountability Is Promised

In the waiver, the ALSDE promises to improve overall accountability. [Holding my breath.] From the waiver:

The new state accountability system will prompt all stakeholders to ask difficult questions about increasing academic achievement and raising instructional quality within Alabama’s schools. An Accountability Delivery Plan will be developed that focuses on the implementation of the new ESEA Flexibility that will include the following:

1. Recognizing and embracing “collective ownership of the problems/struggles/achievements of public schools” by entire communities.
2. Increasing the transparency of the accountability system so that all stakeholders have access to and an understanding of the metrics utilized to measure system, school, and student success.
3. Creating professional development opportunities for teachers and leaders aligned with and descriptive of the new accountability system.

The Rest of the Accountability Stuff

The other four areas will be covered next:

  • the School/District Performance Index,
  • how the achievement gaps are calculated,
  • what the plans are for Reward Schools, Priority Schools, Priority Districts, and Focus Schools
  • the school grading system

Then an attempt will be made to make simple sense out of all of this. Stay tuned.

 

 

Share this

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
About the Author
    Previous Story

    The “Failing” Schools List – What Does It Really Show Us?

    Next Story

    Alabama’s Waiver Part 2 – The Performance Index

    Related Posts

    0

    Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready

    Posted On Sep 14 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

    Posted On Aug 24 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    The Every Student Succeeds Act: The Highlights

    Posted On Nov 30 2015
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    Alabama’s Federal Waiver Request – What Is Changing?

    Posted On May 10 2015
    , By Trisha Powell Crain

    Alabama School Connection Tweets

    Tweets by @ALSchoolConnect

    School Tweets – direct from Twitter

    Tweets from https://twitter.com/ALSchoolConnect/lists/al-k-12-twitter
    Creative Commons License
    This work by Alabama School Connection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Terms of Use
    Privacy Policy

    Past Editions of K-12 Must-Read News

    August 29 to September 25, 2016
    July 25 to August 28, 2016
    June 24 to July 24, 2016
    May 23 to June 23, 2016
    May 2 to May 22, 2016
    April 18 to May 1, 2016
    March 16 to April 17, 2016
    February 23 to March 15, 2016
    February 1 to February 22, 2016
    January 11 to January 31, 2016
    December 21, 2015, thru January 10, 2016
    November 30 thru December 20
    November 11 thru November 30
    October 21 thru November 10
    October 6 thru October 20
    September 14 thru October 5
    August 24 thru September 13
    August 3 thru August 23
    July 16 thru August 2
    June 18 thru July 13
    May 19 thru June 17, 2015
    May 18, 2015
    April 27, 2015
    March 30, 2015
    March 11, 2015
    February 2, 2015
    January 5, 2015
    December 16, 2014

    All past editions available on Storify at https://storify.com/ALSchoolConnect

    This website is intended for informational purposes only. The ASC is a nonprofit news organization and exists only to keep the public informed of issues as they relate to the K-12 education system in Alabama. In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately at the e-mail link below. The ASC does not maintain offices nor a working telephone number dedicated for the organization. Links are provided as a courtesy, not as an endorsement.
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    • If half of it melts at the beach, you’ve still got plenty. Vodka
    • What is an insurance promotion? All of the latest bet365 new
    • One notable feature is the emphasis on quality
    • Concerning the Province of Acbalec Manzi 44. Installation of
    • Пин Ап - официальный сайт онлайн казино
    • Регистрация на сайте и программа лояльности казино Casino X
    • Media conference: NZ arrests in U. It's okay if a few larger