• Support Us
  • Tales from the Meeting
facebook
rss
twitter
youtube
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • District Sites
  • Categories
    • Advocacy
    • Data and Accountability Center
    • Family-School Partnerships
    • Funding and Finance
    • School Policy and Procedure
    • Special Education
    • Standards
  • Glossary
  • Special Reports
    • Alabama Accountability Act (AAA)
    • Bullying Forum Resources
    • The Hidden Cost of Public Education
    • Student Harassment Prevention Act
    • Transparency Projects – 2010 and 2009
    • Reports and Stuff
  • About
    • About Us
    • Business Documents
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fundraising Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Our Supporters
  • 2016 Legislative Session
    • 2015 Legislative Summary
    • 2014 Legislative Summary
    • 2013 Legislative Summary
    • 2012 Legislative Summary
    • 2011 Legislative Summary
  • Support Us
Latest News
Goodbye. But only for a moment
Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved
Enrollment Opens for Alabama’s Non-Traditional High School Diploma
Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law
State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten
What the Annual Alabama “School Incident Report” Shows
Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready
Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?
More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School – Look Up Your School
How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

Alabama’s Not the Only One Implementing Achievement Measures by Subgroups

Posted On Jul 08 2013
By : Trisha Powell Crain
Comments: 8
Tag: 2013 Alabama Legislative Session, Accountability, Alabama Accountability Act, Alabama State Department of Education, ESEA waiver, Family engagement, Plan 2020, School Grading System

Measuring Achievement by SubgroupsBy now, you’ve most likely learned of the approval of Alabama’s waiver from simplistic pass/fail measures under No Child Left Behind (NCLB). You’ve probably also caught wind of the controversy surrounding setting performance measures and benchmarks, known as Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs), based on God-given or since-birth-earned characteristics, known as subgroups, of children.

Somehow Alabama is being singled out as being “un-American” for doing so. The word is spreading like wildfire, fueled in part by this article in The Tuscaloosa News, which an Alabama-based political group decided to twist into being connected to Common Core State Standards and launching ill-informed communications into the stratosphere, where it was then picked up by the Christian Science Monitor, as well as other internet-based sources of information.

State Superintendent Dr. Tommy Bice published his explanation of setting goals by subgroup last Friday, focusing attention on the increased rate of growth in performance expected in subgroups of children who have historically performed at lower achievement levels. The idea behind the method, I’ve learned, is for children who are farther behind to make faster progress over the next six years.

I’ve been clear that I have my own concerns about setting these measures based on subgroup identifications under NCLB, but I am now more concerned (and a bit irritated, truth be told) that the rest of the education media here in Alabama and across the country didn’t know this has been an acceptable method of goal-setting since the first round of waivers were approved in February 2012.

Alabama was the 38th state to receive a waiver, and the 27th 28th to calculate AMOs based on subgroup. (Sorry for the error. Sometimes simple math is the hardest.)

Other States Setting Performance Goals by Subgroups, Too

I completed a painstakingly difficult analysis of all state waivers plus the District of Columbia (D.C.) that have been submitted to the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE), searching simply for who sets performance goals by subgroup. Here’s what I found:

  • 2 states submitted plans but eventually withdrew (Vermont and North Dakota)
  • 2 states waivers were denied (Iowa and California)
  • 2 states have not submitted waiver requests (Montana and Nebraska)
  • 5 waiver requests are pending
  • 40 waiver requests have been approved (39 states plus D.C.)

Looking at the 45 total that are either pending or have been approved:

  •  32 set AMOs by subgroup for accountability purposes, 33 counting Alabama
  • 10 do not set AMOs by subgroup for accountability purposes
  • 2 are unclear regarding how AMOs will be set

But even of those 10 that do not set AMOs by subgroup for accountability purposes, many do use subgroup measures in one form or another, e.g., combining subgroups into “historically underperforming races and ethnicities” or “high-needs” groups, to compare to the “all students” group in their accountability measures.

Results of State Waiver Review

Specifically, I looked for whether AMOs are set by subgroup, which subjects will be included in testing for accountability purposes, and whether AMOs will be set for each school and each school district, and what the “n-size” (minimum number of children in a particular subgroup that must be present before results even count) is. Additionally, I provided either a link or a reference to where I found AMOs for that state.

Here is a downloadable PDF of the results of my review of waiver requests across the country.

I apologize for any errors or omissions. Please contact me if you see an error in the data. Each waiver request was written very differently one from another, and there were no simple checkboxes that provided the information I sought for this review. That made for a painstakingly difficult review process, as previously mentioned.

Why the Outrage Now?

So given that 31 other states have set AMOs the same way Alabama education officials chose to do so, why the outrage now?

Why do national education reform experts not know that this has been happening since the first round of waivers were approved?

Why has Alabama’s largest digital content provider not written a single story about Alabama’s plan, yet took the time to share with us what Florida’s plan to set AMOs by subgroup six weeks after our Alabama State Board of Education approved our waiver request?

What efforts have our local school boards and local school districts made to share this new way of doing things with the public?

While I agree that the communication effort on the Alabama State Department of Education’s (ALSDE) behalf was abysmal (exactly one week for public comment), the media’s lack of coverage was particularly disappointing. With this being such a major huge change in the way the ALSDE and the feds will hold our schools accountable for our students’ achievement, you’d think somebody would have thought that was a good story to share.

Heck, I wrote about it four times between the August 2012 release to the public and the June 2013 approval (scroll to “For Your Review”).

I don’t know what disappoints me more: the ALSDE’s less-than-impressive effort to share it with the public, the media’s unwillingness to even mention it, or the rage of those within our state and across the nation toward Alabama.

I suppose it’s easier to beat up on Alabama than Maryland for doing the same thing.

Accountability Versus Reporting

In grasping what is happening with these AMOs, it is extremely important to understand there is a difference in “accountability” and “reporting”, just as there is a difference in “standards” and “curriculum” (and also in “teaching” and “learning”).

Accountability implies some sort of reward or consequence for results, where reporting is simply that: telling us the results. Alabama is using AMOs by subgroup for accountability measures as well as reporting purposes. But for accountability, those subgroup AMOs only matter in terms of measuring the gap between the subgroup and the “all students” group. For more on that calculation, read this post on how the Performance Index will be calculated and how and when those gaps matter. While all state systems differ from each other, combining students into gap groups is very popular, and has raised suspicion of more than one national advocacy group (this one and this one).

Pay Attention to What’s Happening with the School Grading System

While we are forced to trust the ALSDE and our local districts to hold schools actually accountable for the numbers reported in the Performance Index, we will need to pay particular attention to the School Grading System that is currently being developed where reporting is concerned.

In my review of waivers across the country, I saw some grading systems that were terribly complex and nearly un-interpretable for ordinary folks, but I also saw a couple that were user-friendly and even helpful. We must make certain that whatever Grading System is ultimately adopted is one that we parents, families, and community members find meaningful and useful. Those discussions are happening now. And yet, there has been not a peep from either the ALSDE or the media about the progression of that Grading System. Last I heard, there was an internal working group that would present their work at some point in the future and at that point public input would be invited. That was four months ago.

The Grading System will be tied to the Alabama Accountability Act in 2016, which will determine which schools land on The List of “failing” schools.

Keep your eyes peeled for more information about the Grading System and be prepared to step up and offer input about it if and when the public is invited. You can count on me to share that invitation as soon as it is issued. Be sure to sign up for e-mail notifications of published posts here on the Alabama School Connection site (upper right-hand corner).

Share this

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
About the Author
    Previous Story

    What You Need to Know About Alabama’s Waiver and How Student Achievement Will Now Be Measured

    Next Story

    Notes from the State Board of Education Meeting and Work Session – July 9

    Related Posts

    0

    Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law

    Posted On Oct 02 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten

    Posted On Sep 26 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready

    Posted On Sep 14 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain
    0

    How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

    Posted On Aug 24 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain

    Alabama School Connection Tweets

    Tweets by @ALSchoolConnect

    School Tweets – direct from Twitter

    Tweets from https://twitter.com/ALSchoolConnect/lists/al-k-12-twitter
    Creative Commons License
    This work by Alabama School Connection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Terms of Use
    Privacy Policy

    Past Editions of K-12 Must-Read News

    August 29 to September 25, 2016
    July 25 to August 28, 2016
    June 24 to July 24, 2016
    May 23 to June 23, 2016
    May 2 to May 22, 2016
    April 18 to May 1, 2016
    March 16 to April 17, 2016
    February 23 to March 15, 2016
    February 1 to February 22, 2016
    January 11 to January 31, 2016
    December 21, 2015, thru January 10, 2016
    November 30 thru December 20
    November 11 thru November 30
    October 21 thru November 10
    October 6 thru October 20
    September 14 thru October 5
    August 24 thru September 13
    August 3 thru August 23
    July 16 thru August 2
    June 18 thru July 13
    May 19 thru June 17, 2015
    May 18, 2015
    April 27, 2015
    March 30, 2015
    March 11, 2015
    February 2, 2015
    January 5, 2015
    December 16, 2014

    All past editions available on Storify at https://storify.com/ALSchoolConnect

    This website is intended for informational purposes only. The ASC is a nonprofit news organization and exists only to keep the public informed of issues as they relate to the K-12 education system in Alabama. In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately at the e-mail link below. The ASC does not maintain offices nor a working telephone number dedicated for the organization. Links are provided as a courtesy, not as an endorsement.
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.