• Support Us
  • Tales from the Meeting
facebook
rss
twitter
youtube
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • District Sites
  • Categories
    • Advocacy
    • Data and Accountability Center
    • Family-School Partnerships
    • Funding and Finance
    • School Policy and Procedure
    • Special Education
    • Standards
  • Glossary
  • Special Reports
    • Alabama Accountability Act (AAA)
    • Bullying Forum Resources
    • The Hidden Cost of Public Education
    • Student Harassment Prevention Act
    • Transparency Projects – 2010 and 2009
    • Reports and Stuff
  • About
    • About Us
    • Business Documents
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fundraising Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Our Supporters
  • 2016 Legislative Session
    • 2015 Legislative Summary
    • 2014 Legislative Summary
    • 2013 Legislative Summary
    • 2012 Legislative Summary
    • 2011 Legislative Summary
  • Support Us
Latest News
Goodbye. But only for a moment
Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved
Enrollment Opens for Alabama’s Non-Traditional High School Diploma
Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law
State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten
What the Annual Alabama “School Incident Report” Shows
Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready
Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?
More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School – Look Up Your School
How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

Nepotism Law Provisions Effective September 1

Posted On Jul 25 2015
By : Trisha Powell Crain
Comments: 2
Tag: nepotism

Nepotism Law Provisions_1A number of school boards are considering changes to their nepotism policies due to the passage of Act 2015-486, which adopts a separate definition of nepotism for education employees, clarifying the law to account for the supervisory chains of command that are present in school systems.

Jayne Williams, General Counsel for the Alabama Association of School Boards, recommends that boards not enact policies for situations that are covered by state law, such as the nepotism law.

“If it’s covered by a state law, [school boards] don’t need a policy,” Williams said.

In a situation that is covered by state law, whenever that law changes, the board will have to redo their policy, and some boards can get behind in adapting their policies to newly-changed laws.

What those boards may want to look at, though, is those employees that may be working in situations that could be considered nepotism and whether they need to consider a change in employment structure, as there is no grandfather clause in the law.

Nepotism is defined by Merriam-Webster as the unfair practice by a powerful person of giving jobs and other favors to relatives.

The nepotism law applies to hiring of relatives and actions related to that relative.

First, here’s the definition of “relative”:

The spouse, a dependent, an adult child or his or her spouse, a parent, a spouse’s parent, or a sibling or his or her spouse, of another person.

This means husbands, wives, children, other dependents, adult children, adult children’s spouses, parents, and mothers-, fathers-, sisters-, and brothers-in law.

It doesn’t prohibit relatives working in the same district, or even the same school, as long as proper barriers are erected in hiring, supervising, and evaluating those employees.

Let’s look first at how the hiring process must look if a relative applies for a vacant position.

Hiring Process: Relative of the Superintendent

If a job vacancy is posted and a relative of an “executive officer” (meaning a superintendent) submits an application or otherwise seeks the position, the superintendent cannot be further involved in any action, direct or indirect, regarding the vacancy.

The superintendent must notify the chair of the board of education. The chair of the board will appoint an impartial person to conduct the interview and make a determination as to whether to recommend the person for employment. If the relative is recommended for employment, the person conducting the interview must issue a written report. The board will consider only the written report when making the hiring decision.

Hiring Process: Relative of a Board Member

If a job vacancy is posted and a relative of a board member submits an application or otherwise seeks the position, the board member must recuse himself from any discussion, debate, consideration, or vote on the superintendent’s recommendation regarding that vacancy.

The law states “a person may not evaluate the performance of, have input into the compensation of, or otherwise set the terms and conditions of employment of a subordinate relative”.

Hiring Process: Relative of a Principal or Other Supervisor

If a job vacancy is posted and a relative of a principal or other supervisor who is charged with conducting interviews, vetting or recommending candidates, or otherwise taking part in the hiring process submits an application or otherwise seeks the position, the principal or supervisor may not take any part in the hiring process, directly or indirectly, and any interviews, vetting, or recommendations must be assigned by the superintendent to another administrator in the system who does not report to the disqualified principal or supervisor.

Violations of the Hiring Process Provision

A person who is displaced for a position by a relative in any of the previously mentioned circumstances can file a civil action in circuit court within 21 days of the board’s action to fill the position.

If the court finds a violation of the nepotism law has occurred, the court will declare the hiring decision null and void and the position must be advertised all over again.

Eligibility for Hiring

No person can apply for or be hired into a position where their immediate supervisor would be a relative.

A person can apply for and be hired into a position where a relative would be in the applicant’s chain of command, but not the immediate supervisor. It is important to note that this is only the case if that immediate supervisor makes no recommendation, casts no vote and had no direct or indirect involvement concerning the employee’s hiring.

Evaluation and Compensation Decisions

A person is not allowed to evaluate the performance of, have input into the compensation of, or otherwise set the terms and conditions of employment of a subordinate relative.

A superintendent must ask the board chair to delegate a third party to take action or make recommendations about the superintendent’s relative when it comes to evaluation and compensation decisions.

Consequences of Violating The Nepotism Law

Violation of the law is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $500 and/or imprisonment up to one year.

In addition, both the employee and the employee’s relative will be subject to disciplinary action, which could include termination.

There Is No Grandfather Clause

Again, according to the AASB’s Williams, there is no grandfather clause.

Therefore, if there are any questions as to whether a current employment situation violates the nepotism law, the board’s attorney should be consulted.

Share this

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
    Previous Story

    A Glossary or Two for You

    Next Story

    Get Connected: Duncan Kirkwood Talks School Choice in Alabama

    Alabama School Connection Tweets

    Tweets by @ALSchoolConnect

    School Tweets – direct from Twitter

    Tweets from https://twitter.com/ALSchoolConnect/lists/al-k-12-twitter
    Creative Commons License
    This work by Alabama School Connection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Terms of Use
    Privacy Policy

    Past Editions of K-12 Must-Read News

    August 29 to September 25, 2016
    July 25 to August 28, 2016
    June 24 to July 24, 2016
    May 23 to June 23, 2016
    May 2 to May 22, 2016
    April 18 to May 1, 2016
    March 16 to April 17, 2016
    February 23 to March 15, 2016
    February 1 to February 22, 2016
    January 11 to January 31, 2016
    December 21, 2015, thru January 10, 2016
    November 30 thru December 20
    November 11 thru November 30
    October 21 thru November 10
    October 6 thru October 20
    September 14 thru October 5
    August 24 thru September 13
    August 3 thru August 23
    July 16 thru August 2
    June 18 thru July 13
    May 19 thru June 17, 2015
    May 18, 2015
    April 27, 2015
    March 30, 2015
    March 11, 2015
    February 2, 2015
    January 5, 2015
    December 16, 2014

    All past editions available on Storify at https://storify.com/ALSchoolConnect

    This website is intended for informational purposes only. The ASC is a nonprofit news organization and exists only to keep the public informed of issues as they relate to the K-12 education system in Alabama. In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately at the e-mail link below. The ASC does not maintain offices nor a working telephone number dedicated for the organization. Links are provided as a courtesy, not as an endorsement.
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    • If half of it melts at the beach, you’ve still got plenty. Vodka
    • What is an insurance promotion? All of the latest bet365 new
    • One notable feature is the emphasis on quality
    • Concerning the Province of Acbalec Manzi 44. Installation of
    • Пин Ап - официальный сайт онлайн казино
    • Регистрация на сайте и программа лояльности казино Casino X
    • Media conference: NZ arrests in U. It's okay if a few larger