• Support Us
  • Tales from the Meeting
facebook
rss
twitter
youtube
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • District Sites
  • Categories
    • Advocacy
    • Data and Accountability Center
    • Family-School Partnerships
    • Funding and Finance
    • School Policy and Procedure
    • Special Education
    • Standards
  • Glossary
  • Special Reports
    • Alabama Accountability Act (AAA)
    • Bullying Forum Resources
    • The Hidden Cost of Public Education
    • Student Harassment Prevention Act
    • Transparency Projects – 2010 and 2009
    • Reports and Stuff
  • About
    • About Us
    • Business Documents
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fundraising Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Our Supporters
  • 2016 Legislative Session
    • 2015 Legislative Summary
    • 2014 Legislative Summary
    • 2013 Legislative Summary
    • 2012 Legislative Summary
    • 2011 Legislative Summary
  • Support Us
Latest News
Goodbye. But only for a moment
Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved
Enrollment Opens for Alabama’s Non-Traditional High School Diploma
Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law
State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten
What the Annual Alabama “School Incident Report” Shows
Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready
Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?
More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School – Look Up Your School
How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Cleburne County Student Alleging Discriminatory Treatment

Posted On Aug 16 2016
By : Trisha Powell Crain
Comment: 0
Tag: Cleburne County Board of Education, Cleburne County High School, racial discrimination

Injunction GrantedAn African-American student who filed suit against the Cleburne County Board of Education will return to the football field after U.S. District Judge Virginia Hopkins issued an order temporarily setting aside the extended punishment given to him last February banning him from participating in any extracurricular activities for the first nine weeks of the current school year.

The order is connected to a lawsuit filed by the student in July.

In order to grant the injunction, Hopkins had to determine whether the student, Cleburne County High School senior Chad Brown, might succeed in his claim that the board discriminated against him because of his race. Hopkins declared that “the Court holds that there is a substantial likelihood of [Brown] succeeding on the merits of his equal protection claim”.

In other words, evidence presented in the hearing shows the three board members, Hope Lee, Jerry Cash, and Lonny Watson, who voted for Brown’s punishment likely did discriminate against Brown by punishing him in a different manner than two white females accused of the same code of conduct violation.

During the 2015-2016 school year, Alabama State Department of Education enrollment information showed that 91% of the students in the Cleburne County school system are white.

On August 2, Brown’s attorney, Clarence Dortch, requested a hearing to ask the judge to set aside the punishment, initially given in February but the board extended through the summer and into the first nine weeks of the 2016-2017 school year after an appeal.

After hearing evidence for six hours in federal court in Birmingham on Monday, Hopkins granted the request, finding that not allowing Brown to play football would result in “a substantial threat that the plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted”.

A high school football coach testified at the hearing that if a high school senior did not get to play football during his senior year, it could cost him the opportunity to play football at the college level.

In her order, Hopkins wrote: “If [Brown] does not receive a scholarship to play football, he will, at the very least, have a difficult time paying for college, and, at worse, will not be able to attend college.”

Brown’s father said that multiple colleges had expressed an interest in Brown’s football abilities, but due to the punishment given by the board in February, Brown had been unable to participate in any football camps through the high school during the spring and summer.

After listening to testimony and viewing evidence of how the three members of the Cleburne County board of education conducted due process hearings, Hopkins took board members to task for multiple due process violations and recommended they “reexamine” how they conduct due process hearings in the future.

What Happened and Why This Became a Federal Lawsuit

Here’s the initial article we published about Brown’s lawsuit. In the suit, Brown claimed Lee, Cash, and Watson violated his due process rights and had “arbitrarily and capriciously discriminated” against him in the punishment they levied, violating the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. The suit alleges the punishment Brown was given by the board was more severe than white students guilty of the same offense. Three board members, Lee, Cash, and Watson, voted for the punishment Brown alleges was discriminatory.

Here’s what happened and what was said during testimony in Monday’s hearing.

On January 8, 2016, a small amount of marijuana was found in Brown’s truck on the high school campus during a routine search for drugs. A police report indicated the street value was less than one dollar.

Drug possession is a class III offense in the board’s code of conduct.

According to Cleburne County’s code of conduct, a class III offense requires immediate suspension until a hearing can be scheduled with the board of education. Board policy recommends expulsion for any student guilty of a class III offense, however the board can exercise discretion.

Brown was one of five students on the high school campus to be found in possession of marijuana as a result of that search. Brown was the only African-American student. The other four students were white.

Board members testifying at the hearing said that if students were guilty of using or possessing drugs, those students were routinely sent to alternative school.

However, if students were guilty of providing drugs to other students, the board routinely expelled those students, as a student providing drugs to other students is a danger to the student population, they explained.

A hearing was held on January 20 for all five students. The five-member elected board of education serves as the sole governing body over student hearings on class III offenses.

Three of the students, all of whom are white, were given alternative school through the remainder of the school year.

Brown and one of the white students were both expelled for the remainder of the school year.

The white student that was expelled admitted to providing drugs to other students. Brown had not been accused of providing drugs to other students nor had he admitted to doing so.

So why was Brown expelled?

An Unproven Accusation Against Brown

Board members Cash and Lee said they voted to expel Brown because they believed an unproven accusation made by a white female student, identified in court as C.M., that Brown had provided her with the marijuana she was caught with.

C.M. made that accusation during her disciplinary hearing for “swapping pills” with two other white female students on campus in December.

An investigation by the school’s principal found no evidence to support C.M.’s claim against Brown. Brown was never charged with anything in connection to C.M.’s claim.

In December, the board voted to send C.M. and a second female student to alternative school as punishment for that class III offense. The third girl withdrew from school before the hearing.

Hopkins noted the board had not followed the routine to which they testified—expelling students guilty of providing drugs to other students—in the case of C.M. and the other female, both of whom were white.

Lee explained the reason the board did not expel the two white students: the high school principal had asked for leniency for the girls, which the board granted.

However, that disparate treatment is the basis on which Hopkins based her ruling: the two white female students, guilty of what was referred to as “trafficking” during the hearing, were not expelled, while Brown, who was only accused but not found guilty of that offense, was expelled.

Though C.M.’s accusation was never proven, Cash and Lee both testified they believed C.M., and that their belief in her claim that Brown provided her with marijuana is why they expelled him at the January 20 hearing.

Neither Brown’s father nor Brown knew the board members were considering C.M.’s unproven allegation as part of their decision-making process in expelling Brown.

Hopkins saw that as a probable violation of Brown’s due process rights because the board never brought that charge in front of Brown, and Brown was never given the opportunity to deny the claim.

Brown’s father appealed the expulsion after learning that the white students had been sent to alternative school for what Brown’s father believed to be the same charge (drug possession). Brown’s father also testified he was concerned that his son was falling behind in math and other subjects while being taught at home.

The board granted his request for appeal, which was held on February 5.

Brown’s father was told by board members during that appeal that his son was guilty of providing drugs to another student. Brown’s father denied the allegation and was adamant that his son wouldn’t do that. Brown did not attend the appeal hearing.

Tapes of both the initial due process hearing and the appeal were played in court.

As a result of the appeal, Cash, Lee, and Watson voted to repeal the expulsion and send Brown to alternative school.

However, they tacked on an additional punishment: suspend Brown’s extracurricular and parking privileges through the first nine weeks of the 2016-2017 school year. That punishment was not given to any other student.

Board members still believed C.M.’s unproven allegation, they testified.

As a result of that additional punishment, Brown was unable to participate in any spring training or summer camps through the high school.

The Order

Hopkins’ order took effect immediately, and Brown is expected to participate in the first high school football game of the season on Friday.

Brown’s attorney declined to comment on Hopkins’ order, as even though the punishment has been set aside, the lawsuit continues.

Here’s Hopkins’ full order.

U.S. District Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins order in Cleburne County lawsuit by Trisha Powell Crain on Scribd

Share this

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
    Previous Story

    Public Meetings for the Every Student Succeeds Act Start Tuesday, August 9

    Next Story

    Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama’s Schools?

    Related Posts

    3

    Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Filed on Behalf of Student at Cleburne County High School

    Posted On Jul 07 2016
    , By Trisha Powell Crain

    In Case You Missed It

    Goodbye. But only for a moment

    Posted On Oct 14 2016

    Special Education Services Division Complaint Resolved

    Posted On Oct 14 2016

    Enrollment Opens for Alabama's Non-Traditional High School Diploma

    Posted On Oct 05 2016

    Some Answers About the Alabama Accountability Act from New Reports Mandated by Law

    Posted On Oct 02 2016

    State Department Violated Federal Disability Laws, Test Accommodation Policy Must Be Rewritten

    Posted On Sep 26 2016

    What the Annual Alabama "School Incident Report" Shows

    Posted On Sep 21 2016

    Alabama’s A-F School Grading System Is Almost Ready

    Posted On Sep 14 2016

    Wanna Know More About Who Gets Paddled in Alabama's Schools?

    Posted On Sep 12 2016

    More Than 90,000 Alabama Students and Nearly 15,000 Teachers Missed a LOT of School - Look Up Your School

    Posted On Sep 01 2016

    How Alabama Compares in the Latest ACT College and Career Readiness Report

    Posted On Aug 24 2016

    Get Connected on The Alabama Way

    Looking for something?

    Creative Commons License
    This work by Alabama School Connection is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Terms of Use
    Privacy Policy

    Past Editions of K-12 Must-Read News

    August 29 to September 25, 2016
    July 25 to August 28, 2016
    June 24 to July 24, 2016
    May 23 to June 23, 2016
    May 2 to May 22, 2016
    April 18 to May 1, 2016
    March 16 to April 17, 2016
    February 23 to March 15, 2016
    February 1 to February 22, 2016
    January 11 to January 31, 2016
    December 21, 2015, thru January 10, 2016
    November 30 thru December 20
    November 11 thru November 30
    October 21 thru November 10
    October 6 thru October 20
    September 14 thru October 5
    August 24 thru September 13
    August 3 thru August 23
    July 16 thru August 2
    June 18 thru July 13
    May 19 thru June 17, 2015
    May 18, 2015
    April 27, 2015
    March 30, 2015
    March 11, 2015
    February 2, 2015
    January 5, 2015
    December 16, 2014

    All past editions available on Storify at https://storify.com/ALSchoolConnect

    This website is intended for informational purposes only. The ASC is a nonprofit news organization and exists only to keep the public informed of issues as they relate to the K-12 education system in Alabama. In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately at the e-mail link below. The ASC does not maintain offices nor a working telephone number dedicated for the organization. Links are provided as a courtesy, not as an endorsement.
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.